Why did the New Archaeologists adopt Hempel’s covering-law model of explanation?

Michael E Smith asks why some New Archaeologists adopted Hempel’s covering law model of explanation in the early 1970s despite its known problems. A good question, and definitely worth pondering. There haven’t been volumes written about this, but there has been some reflection, and clues are available here and there. The short answer is that…

Dear reputable publishers: there are no trustworthy journals. There are replicable results, and good, well-supported arguments

Elsevier recently published an interview with Philippe Terheggen, their Managing Director of STM journals, about the importance of trustworthy publishers and journals for the integrity of science, in a world he portrays as increasingly corrupted by disreputable predatory publishers. “Trusted research information”, claims the article “remains an important cornerstone of the scientific process and contributes…