What Open Access doesn’t mean

In the wake of all the noise about corporate backed Open Access (OA) initiatives, this week brings a lively and somewhat colourful discussion on what it means to be OA. I very much like James L Smith’s distinction between technically OA and ethically OA. It proves useful for reflection. There is definitely a push from…

The evils of Open Science

The ever-reliable Jon Tennant brings our attention this week to Philip Mirkowski’s recently published essay on the evils of Open Science (capitalized here for dramatic effect). At first, I found the paper baffling. The first baffling aspect is that it is a pay-walled paper about open science. To summarize his complaint: Open science equals neo-liberalism.…

Springer Nature has told us everything we need to know about the future of academic publishing: Disintermediation is here

Springer Nature’s recent stock initial public offering (IPO) ultimately failed, but it provided the academic community with plenty of information about the company’s and the academic publishing industry’s philosophy, as well as its anxieties. In fact, the prospectus that accompanied the IPO reads like an extended, dire warning about the dangers facing traditional academic publishers…